Jump to content


Photo

Opinions on this Sibset


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 babynamegoddess

babynamegoddess

    Power Baby Namer

  • Gold Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 847 posts
  • Gender:Female

Posted 12 April 2018 - 07:26 PM

Susannah Marie

Davia Lynn

Annika Michael-Rose

 

Opinions?



#2 DanielleH

DanielleH

    Epic Baby Namer

  • BNG Addict
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,099 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Portugal

Posted 12 April 2018 - 08:05 PM

I think all names have a completely different style. I prefer to see names with similar length, popularity and style. I would also avoid to give a different number of middle names.

#3 Marvelous_Things

Marvelous_Things

    Genie-ous Baby Namer

  • BNG Addict
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,663 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:United States
  • Interests:Movies, music, psychology, history, literature, anime, cosplay, and names.

Posted 17 April 2018 - 02:48 PM

I think these are beautiful names and that they could work for sisters. However, I agree with Danielle that siblings should have the same number of middle names, so I'd drop Michael and just go with Annika Rose, which is gorgeous.



#4 .:alexandra:.

.:alexandra:.

    Superstar Baby Namer

  • Gold Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 569 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:Australia
  • Interests:linguistics, psychology, books, conspiracy theories (within reason), equality, space/astrology, names

Posted 25 April 2018 - 07:36 AM

I agree with Marvelous_Things, Annika Rose is gorgeous!

 

I think Davia and Annika go well together, but Susannah maybe not as much.



#5 DestinyH

DestinyH

    Novice Baby Namer

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 17 posts

Posted 01 December 2018 - 05:17 PM

I think they sound good just as they are. Siblings don't have to have to same amount of middle names. My siblings and I don't. Here's our initials
Me-D.D.H
Sister-K.J.H
Brother-J.A.C.H




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users