
Royal babies 3 & 4?!
#1
Posted 11 February 2016 - 09:36 PM
Of course, this name holds much significance to particularly Prince William.
What do you think they will name the other, and any middle name thoughts?
#2
Posted 13 February 2016 - 07:31 PM
I don't think Kate is actually pregnant?? Especially if they're saying she's far enough along w/ twins that they would know the gender-- she doesn't have a baby bump. I mean it could be true, but it doesn't seem likely imo. Charlotte is only 9 months.
#3
Posted 14 February 2016 - 03:17 PM
I don't think Kate is actually pregnant?? Especially if they're saying she's far enough along w/ twins that they would know the gender-- she doesn't have a baby bump. I mean it could be true, but it doesn't seem likely imo. Charlotte is only 9 months.
I was wondering the same thing..but as I look it back up again, it appears she is only around 2-3 mos pregnant. Possible to know about twins, but not gender. We will just have to keep waiting to see!

#4
Posted 21 February 2016 - 04:53 AM
I think they are only rumours, there has been no royal announcement of a pregnancy as far as I can find. I don't think they would use Diana as a first name either, as they have already used it as a middle name for Charlotte.
#5
Posted 23 February 2016 - 05:11 PM
The palace would have reported it by now as with twins her morning sickness and bump would be a lot more obvious and with her history of morning sickness, I think they would be extra cautious with twins, considering how careful they were with Charlotte.
IMO, I really have only seen one place claim this (at least here in the western us) and they're very not reliable.
- PaperHeart and Addison like this
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users